It is clear that this opposition is no longer tenable

The increase in unemployment, resulting from the financial crisis in the global economy since the fall of 2008, raises concerns and proposals to control the trade. What we talking Free trade implies that the specialization of producers in their areas of excellence can improve social welfare. Instead of producing wheat, wine and shoes, a producer's interest to produce wheat by obtaining better yields and to buy wine and shoes to other producers.

What would this principle of free trade for the current economic difficulties

The promotion of trade based on comparative advantages, on the international level, assumes that all countries follow the same rules of law and the same social and environmental standards. However, for example, Chinese workers suffer high levels of pollution and enjoy social protection very reduced outside members of Government and public enterprises. Normally, it should impose on products coming from China of compensatory taxes to account for these elements. The world Organization of the trade (WTO) refused to take into account these developments, despite numerous debates so far. It is clear that this opposition is no longer tenable. International trade must incorporate social and environmental standards by compensatory taxes spreads, that the G20 Summit has carefully avoided addressing.

Europe has always adopted a very large opening free trade vision, so that it is now more open to the world zone. It does even not reciprocity in the opening exchanges, that is, the markets of the countries with which it trade are also open than hers. It should therefore not apply to free trade which is due to European trade policy, both naïve and laxiste.

Then, the European Central Bank does not an offensive foreign exchange policy. She agreed without respond the very strong rise of the euro in 2005 to the summer 2008. The euro is the single currency area which has no objectives of Exchange because there is no agreement between the Member countries of the zone on the appropriate level of the exchange rate.

As the France, she lost massive market share since 1999, notably within the euro area: it is not the international free trade which explains the loss of market share while the Germany has maintained, notably by massively increasing its exports to the France and the Italy. The major imbalances in the external trade of the France are not be due to free trade but questionable European choice and obvious economic weaknesses in France.

Our country suffers particularly having failed to promote the development of its small and medium-sized enterprises, so that lack us today, population resident on the metropolitan territory, 10,000 companies of 500 people for activity of the population rates comparable to those of countries whose growth in the medium term is more balanced than ours. ACHS in the industry and distribution concerning their own French subcontractors while German and Japanese industrial companies protect their.

Free trade is like water: can top swim or drown in it. The result depends on the swimmer and non-water!

What to do That Europe scans before his door by integrating the reciprocity in trade and promoting the integration of environmental costs in prices import. The euro area expands a coherent economic government and a foreign exchange policy to influence the parities between the euro, the dollar, the yuan and the yen. Finally, it must be that the France reform the practices of its production apparatus and that it reform its public sphere to enhance the effectiveness and reduce the weight of the samples on the productive activity. As long as Europe and the France will not action strategy consistent with the nature of the world as it is, there is nothing to accuse the evils that are foreign trade.